The beginning
of the gospel about Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Mark 1:1 (NIV)
Most
modern biblical scholars believe Mark was the first Gospel written about Jesus
Christ’s ministry. Until about 1800, the church generally accepted the view,
first advanced by Augustine, that Matthew’s Gospel was the first Gospel written.
Before the 1800’s, biblical scholars took the view that Mark abbreviated
Matthew’s Gospel, and Luke used both Matthew and Mark to compose his Gospel
message.
If
Mark’s Gospel was the first Gospel written, then Mark started a new literary
genre with no parallels. There were really no parallels in the Old Testament,
ancient Judaism or Greco-Roman literature. Mark created a new and unique
literary genre to help a first century audience facing a particular first
century situation under the inspiration of God’s Holy Spirit. Many modern biblical
scholars believe the other Gospel writers (Matthew, Luke and John) continued
Mark’s new unique literary genre in writing about Jesus Christ’s ministry.
There
were other first century forms of literature that were similar to a Gospel. Some
argued that the Gospel writers were imitating a first century form of literature
called Roman biographies. In the first century, these biographies were a
mixture of historical fact, interpretation, and propaganda. Unlike the Gospels,
Roman biographies never told of the struggles and hardships of the Roman Emperors.
Yet, the Gospel writers told of Jesus Christ’s humanness, including His sorrow
(Mark 14:34), disappointment (Mark 8:12), displeasure (Mark 10:14-15), anger
(Mark 11:15-17), amazement (Mark 6:6), fatigue (Mark 4:38) and even uncertainty
(Mark 13:32).
Some
argued that the Gospels were just another form of miracle stories. In the first
century Roman world, there were written collections of miracle stories. These
stories included figures or people in the first century Roman Empire that were
given the name “divine men,” also called “theois aner” in Greek. An example of
such men included Simon Magus in Acts 8:9-25. These divine men were sorcerers
or magicians and they were able to perform miracles. In Greek literature, the
Greco-Romans believed the Greek gods lived on Mount Olympics and these Greek gods
would sometimes make a sneak appearance on earth disguised a man. At Acts 14:8-20,
when Paul and Barnabas were at Lystra and miraculous healed a slave girl, the
people of Lystra believed the “gods have come down to us in human form” (Acts
14:12). Paul and Barnabas were given the
names of the two Greek gods, Zeus and Hermes and they were seen as divine men. In
the first century, there were stories of these divine men and some argue say
that the Gospel writers were essentially a pattern of these theois aner
stories, particularly the Gospel of Mark. Much of Mark’s Gospel consisted of
the miraculous healings of Jesus Christ. However, these miraculous accounts of
these divine men verse the miracles of the Gospel are radically different. Many
of these miracle stories of divine men emphasized the mechanics of actually how
the miracles were done. However, the Gospels especially in Mark recorded Jesus
Christ’s miracles but the Gospel writers gave no mechanics of how He performed
His miracles. Thus although there were some similarities of divine men stories
and the Gospels of the first century, these divine men stories were weak in
comparison to the Gospels.
In
summary, Gospels about Jesus Christ were not just a form of an Emperor
biography or a theois aner story. Although these other first century literary
forms may be similar to a Gospel, Mark’s Gospel was a unique literary genre
with no real precedent and no significant comparison. One cannot explain the
Gospel as divine men stories or a Roman Emperor biography.
In
the New Testament, the word “Gospel” has two different meanings. First, the
Gospel is the actual words spoken directly from Jesus Christ’s lips about the
reign of God (Mark 1:14). Second, the Gospel is the story told about Jesus
Christ’s earthly death and resurrection (Galatians 1:11-12; 1 Corinthians
15:1-8). The Gospel message Apostle Paul preached was the Good News of victory
over sin through the saving effects of Jesus Christ’s death by crucifixion and
of His triumph over death in His resurrection. Faith in Jesus Christ’s death
and resurrection is the only hope for sinful humans to “inherit the Kingdom of
God” (1 Corinthians 15:50-53-57). In each case “Gospel” refers to the work
which God alone initiates and completes through His Son Jesus Christ. The
central figure of the Gospel is Jesus Christ, in and through whom the history
and the promises of the Old Testament are fulfilled (see Luke 24:27, 44-47; see
Hebrews 1:1-2). Therefore, the Gospel is the continuation of the work which God
began in Jesus Christ.
In
Mark 1:1, Mark declares the essential content of his Gospel. At the very
outset, Mark announces that the content of the Gospel is the Person of Jesus,
who is the Christ and Son of God (Mark 1:1). “The beginning of the gospel about
Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Mark 1:1, NIV). This message is a brief
confession of faith, the meaning of which will unfold as the reader follows
Mark’s presentation of Jesus Christ in his Gospel. For Mark, the Gospel is the message
and story of God’s saving activity through the life, death, and resurrection of
God’s unique Son Jesus Christ. In the apparent appearance of Jesus in Galilee,
a new age had dawn that requires repentance and faith. Mark’s written record of
Jesus’ life is itself called a Gospel. The most basic summary of Jesus Christ’s
preaching appears in Mark 1:15. “The time has come,” Jesus said. “The kingdom
of God is near. Repent and believe the Good News!” Jesus Christ’s purpose was
to bring the Kingdom of God. He is the Proclaimer and Bringer of the Kingdom
and all aspects of Jesus Christ’s life and death are related to this mission of
the Kingdom.
The
word gospel simply means “good news.” The “Gospel of Jesus Christ” is the Good
News that God's unique Son has come into the world and died for our sins. The
Gospel is the Good News because through faith in God’s Son our sins can be
forgiven, we can be reconciled to God, and declared God’s child (e.g., see John
1:12-14; John 3:16-17; Ephesians 2:5, 8-9; 2 Corinthians 5:11-21). Even more,
the Gospel is God’s proclamation victory over sin, death, and hell (see 1 Corinthians
15:1-8, 51-52; Galatians 1:1-9). The Gospel is the power of God’s Holy Spirit to
raise the dead, to bring new life, and release bondage from sin (Romans 1:16-17;
Romans 15:13; 1 Corinthians 2:4-5; 1 Thessalonians 1:5).
Gospel
is the usual New Testament translation of the Greek word “euangelion.” The
concept of good news itself finds its roots in the Hebrew language of the Old
Testament. In both the Old Testament and in Greek literature, euangelion was
commonly used for reports of victory from the battlefield. Also, the
“euangelion” was used in the Greco-Roman world as describing the birthday of
the Emperor. In the Greco-Roman world, the birth of the Emperor was seen as a
manifestation of a god in the first century. For example in 9 B.C., the
birthday of Caesar Augustus was hailed as “euangelion.” Since Caesar Augustus
was hailed as a god, his birthday signaled the beginning of good news for the
world. Yet, the Old Testament Prophet Isaiah used “good news” as the
anticipated deliverance and salvation from the hand of God when the
long-awaited Messiah appeared to deliver Israel (Isaiah 52:7; Isaiah 61:1-3). The
military-political and personal references of good news were united in the hope
of a Messiah who would deliverer God’s people and usher in a new age of
salvation. The arrival of this Messiah would be good news. For Mark, the arrival
(advent) of Jesus Christ is the beginning of the fulfillment of the “good news”
announced by the Prophet Isaiah. Christians increasingly used euanggelion as a
specific term to describe the good news of Jesus.
Normally,
people have defined the Gospel as the story of Jesus Christ. However, the
Gospels are not true biographies of Jesus Christ. The Gospels essentially omit
the first 30 years of Jesus’ life and focus mostly on the last three years of
Jesus Christ’s life. Apart from Jesus Christ’s birth (see Matthew 1–2; Luke
1–2) and one from His youth at age twelve (Luke 2:41–52), the four Gospels
record essentially the last two or three years of Jesus Christ’s public
ministry. Moreover, the Gospels tells us very little of Jesus Christ’s family
life including His earthly father, His brothers and sisters. Essentially,
Joseph never appears in the story after Jesus Christ’s birth. The Gospels give
few reference to His brothers and sister (Matthew 12:46-50; Mark 3:21, 31-32;
Mark 6:3; Luke 8:19-21; John 7:4-5) and no reference to Jesus’ educational
background. Even the length of Jesus Christ’s public ministry is normally
believed to be three years based on John’s Gospel references to Jesus’
attendance at three Passover events in Jerusalem. The traditional chronological
of three years is based on the chronology of John where Jesus Christ went to
Jerusalem on three different Passovers. Therefore, the Gospels are not true
biographies of Jesus Christ’s life.
Even
more, the four Gospel writers did not write their Gospels as an objective
historical survey of Jesus Christ’s life and ministry. These Gospel writers
were evangelist and they were calling readers to a commitment and faith in
Jesus Christ. Moreover, the Gospel writers presented four distinctive theological
portraits of Jesus Christ sent to four different first century Christian
communities to help them deal with their circumstances. Matthew’s Gospel was
written primarily for the Jews. After all, Matthew had to prove to his readers
that Jesus Christ was indeed the rightful Heir to David's throne. Luke’s Gospel
focused mainly Jesus Christ's humanity, for he knew that his Greek readers
would identify with the perfect Babe who grew up to be the perfect Man. John's
Gospel begins with a statement about eternity because John wrote to prove to
the whole world that Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the Son of God (John 20:31).
Mark wrote his Gospel for the Romans, and his theme is Jesus Christ the Servant
(Mark 10:45). The Gospel of Mark reveals Jesus Christ as God's Servant, sent to
minister to suffering people and to die for the sins of the world. Mark gives
us no account of Jesus Christ’s birth, nor does Mark record a genealogy of
Jesus Christ. Essentially, the Gospel writers give four distinctive versions of
the same story of Jesus Christ. The church has resisted any attempts to
harmonize the four Gospel accounts of Jesus Christ into one story.
Around
A.D. 150, Tatian compiled the life of Jesus Christ, called the Diatessaron. In
the Diatessaron, Tatian attempted to harmonize the four Gospels into one account
of Jesus Christ. Tatian
started with John’s Gospel and John’s chronological of Jesus Christ’s life and tried
to Matthew, Mark and Luke’s Gospels into John’s chronological to create one
Gospel account of Jesus Christ. Principally, the Diatessaron is a harmony of
the four New Testament Gospels and attempted to simplify the Gospels into one
account of the life of Jesus Christ. However, Tatian’s Diatessaron was
eventually rejected by the early church and the Diatessaron no longer exists.
Prior
to Tatian’s Diatessaron, the church had accepted the four-fold Gospels as a
faithful witness to Jesus Christ. At an early date, the church realized that
the combined witness of the four Gospels was required to proclaim the full and
distinctive theological portrait of Jesus Christ. From the late second century
forward, the Gospels have been circulated as a four-fold written collection of Jesus
Christ. The early church saw a unique witness of Jesus Christ in each Gospel
account and it was important to preserve the uniqueness of Jesus Christ’s life
in each Gospel.
Matthew,
Mark and Luke Gospels are often called collectively the “Synoptic Gospels”.
These three Gospels tell essentially the same story of Jesus Christ in a
similar fashion and similar content. The Synoptic Gospels casts the life of
Jesus Christ within the framework of a Galilean ministry that extended from His
baptism to His death, with emphasis on His final week on earth. The Gospels of Matthew,
Mark and Luke recount many of the same incidents or teachings of Jesus Christ
often in the same or related wording, arrangement, and content (e.g., see Matthew
3:13–17, Mark 1:9–11, and Luke 3:21–22). However, the Gospel of John presents a
more independent account of Jesus Christ’s public ministry. John's Gospel
begins with a statement about Jesus Christ’s eternity (John 1:1-5). John wrote his
Gospel to prove to the whole world that Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the unique
and eternal Son of God (see John 1:18; John 3:16; John 20:31).
In
the past 200 years, a great deal of study has been devoted to discovering the
historical Jesus Christ of the Gospels. There were probably 50 or more gospels
written other than the first four Gospels found in the New Testament. These
gospels are often called “apocryphal gospels” and they were written much later
than the first four Gospels given in the New Testament. The Gospels in the New
Testament were all composed by the end of the first century. However, the
apocryphal gospels came out of the second, third, fourth and fifth centuries. Out
of many gospels and other accounts of the life of Jesus (Luke 1:1-2), God led
the early church to choose the four Gospel which He had inspired by the Holy
Spirit – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
In
the mid-1980s, a group called the “Jesus Seminar” lead by Robert Funk tried to
find the historical or “real” Jesus. This group felt that the portrait of Jesus
Christ through the early church was distorted over the years. This group saw
the Gospels as a collection of what people had come to believe about Jesus
Christ. This group sought to discover the “real” Jesus by surveying all
documents that discussed Jesus Christ from the first 500 years of church
history and this included these apocryphal gospels. Thus, the Jesus Seminar group
gave the apocryphal gospels equal importance or equal weight as the first four
Gospels written in the first century. The picture of Jesus Christ that emerges
from the Jesus Seminar is often modern, politically correct, peaceful, and fits
into the 21st century. Sadly, the portrait of Jesus Chris from
these
apocryphal gospels is distinctly different from the theological portrait of
Jesus Christ of the four Gospels of the New Testament.
Nevertheless,
how did the oral communications about Jesus transition from a spoken message to
written books? The four-fold Gospels did not miraculous drop from the sky and
appear. There was a long and complex process to the creation of the Gospels
after Jesus Christ’s death and ascension. Historical documents outside the
Bible documents approximately AD 30 Jesus Christ was crucified and dead at the
hands Rome by Pontius Pilate. Approximately AD 30 marked the end of the earthly
life of Jesus Christ (see also Acts 1). In approximately AD 65 or 68, this was
the beginning appearance of the first written Gospel. Mark was the first Gospel
believed to have been written around AD 65 and the last Gospel written believed
to be John’s Gospel around AD 90. Matthew and Luke appeared to have been
written around AD 70 to 90. Thus, there was approximately 35 to 40 years between
the events of Jesus Christ’s life and Mark’s Gospel. This puzzles approximately
40 year gaps between Jesus Christ’s life and the first written Gospel puzzles the
modern world. Twenty-first century westerner society was geared to writings and
skeptical of the long delay and possible forgetfulness of the Gospel writers.
Yet,
first century Palestine where Jesus Christ’s lived and ministered was an oral society.
In first century Palestine, this period was a period of oral traditions and
oral traditions about Jesus Christ circulated among the Christian churches by
the witnesses of the historical Jesus during AD 30 and AD 60. Reading ability
was uncommon in the ancient world. Books and writing equipment were expensive
and usually reserved for the rich alone. Consequently, many societies including
first century Palestine preserved and transmitted the message about Jesus
Christ by word of mouth. Such a system may seem fragile and unreliable by
modern standards, but ancient societies including first century Palestine trusted
these oral methods and forms they developed to sustain the process. Within the
New Testament, the word euanggelion always refers to oral communications about
Jesus Christ, never to a document or piece of literature. The remaining Twelve disciples
of Jesus Christ (e.g. John, Matthew, and Peter) that witnessed the historical Jesus
and many others such as Apostle Paul, John Mark, and Luke would circulate the
message of Jesus Christ’s life by oral communications. The early church
missionaries received pieces of Jesus Christ’s story from these authoritative disciples
of Jesus Christ and this how the stories of Jesus Christ spread in the first
century. Many biblical scholars believe that there were probably written parts
of the Jesus Christ’s story during this period of oral traditions. Most likely,
the Passion story of Jesus Christ and the last week of Jesus Christ’s life from
Palm Sunday with the Triumphal Entry to Easter Sunday were written down in
first century Palestine. Also, New Testament writings of Apostle Paul, the other
disciples of Jesus Christ, and even the Apostle Creed focused on Jesus Christ’s
Passion (death and resurrection). In fact, Apostle Paul’s teaching and thirteen
Epistles focused little on the earthly life of Jesus Christ and focused primarily
on Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection first. Besides, the Passion story of
Jesus Christ is almost identical in the four Gospels of the New
Testament. However, when one starts at the Passion story and work backward,
there is more variety and less agreement in the four Gospel message. First
instance, Mark has no birth story of Jesus Christ, Luke’s and Matthew’s birth
stories of Jesus Christ are different. So the most substantial agreement of
Jesus Christ’s life is His Passion.
Also,
there was no need to write down the events of Jesus Christ’s life because from approximately
AD 30 to AD 70 the eyewitnesses to Jesus Christ’s life events were alive. The remaining
Twelves disciples of Jesus Christ and many other faithful followers who had physically
seen and eyewitness the historical Jesus and heard His teaching were alive and
could authenticate His life and ministry (see Acts 1:21-22). In the first
century, there were other stories of Jesus Christ such as the infancy gospel of
Thomas but these stories were never canonized and never authenticated by the
Twelve. Moreover, some stories of Jesus Christ were not written down because
the people of the first century believed in the imminent end of the world and
the return of Jesus Christ (e.g. see 1 Thessalonians 4:13-5:11).
Then,
about thirty years after Jesus Christ’s ascension to heaven, several interrelated
crises impacted the early church. As a result of these crises, the early church
responded to the leadership of God’s Holy Spirit to write down the teachings,
stories, and message of Jesus. Around AD 65, the Gospels started to appear in
written form. First of all, by AD 70 most of the Christians were in the Roman
world and the Roman world was geared towards written documents, unlike Palestine’s
oral society. With the persecution of Christians in Palestine, the Gospel
message about Jesus Christ had spread rapidly into the Roman world. Most of the
Christian church – evangelists, teachers and preachers – were not in Jerusalem
but in the utter most parts of the Roman world (see Matthew 28:16-20; Acts
1:8).
Also
during this time, the Emperor Nero initiated the first official persecution so
he could use early Christians as scapegoats for his own insane actions. After
setting fire to the city of Rome in A.D. 64 as a way to clear a portion of the
city for a construction project, Nero unfairly accused Christians for committing
the burning of Rome. On the basis of this supposed guilt, Nero began
persecution of Christians which included arrest, imprisonment, torture, and
execution. The persecution begun by Nero continued in varying degrees by other
Roman officials throughout the New Testament period. From a historical
perspective, this persecution by Nero and others may have strengthened the spirit
of the early church. Moreover by AD 70, most the eyewitnesses to Jesus Christ’s
earthly ministry were dead leaving few disciples to authenticate the message of
Jesus Christ’s life. Most believe by AD 70 most of the remaining Twelve disciples
and other faithful followers of Jesus, including Apostle Paul were martyred
except John who lived to the end of the first century. Some disciples during
Nero’s persecutions and others simply aged enough to pass away from natural
causes. The early church placed a high value on these faithful disciples and
their actually having seen and heard Jesus Christ (Luke 1:2; 1 John 1:1). These
witnesses had actually “heard . . . seen . . . looked at . . . touched” the
historical Jesus during His public ministry (1 John 1:1; see also John 1:14;
John 19:35; John 20:27; Luke 24:28; Acts 4:20; 2 Peter 1:16; 1 John 4:14)). So since most of the personal eyewitnesses of
Jesus Christ were deceased, there was a mission by the early church to transfer
the oral traditions of Jesus Christ to written form. Finally, there was the
realization of many believers of Jesus Christ that end of the world was not
near. Members of the early church believed Jesus would return soon, so they
felt no real urgency to write down His teachings for the future generations. Preaching
recorded in the New Testament’s books such as Acts, Romans, and Corinthians have
a distinct sense of urgency about the return of Jesus. The apostles believed
that Jesus would be returning any day and that it was more important for them
to give as many people as possible the opportunity to respond to the Gospel
than to written down the message. Their constant emphasis was to communicate
the Gospel and not to preserve the Gospel for the future. As a longer and
longer period of time passed after Jesus’ ascension, the church became more and
more concerned about preserving the Gospel message. The expectation of the
immediacy of Jesus Christ’s return lessened by AD 70 and the fall of the Jewish
Temple. So the expectation of the imminent of the end of the world was modified
with the fall of the Temple. So, the oral traditions of Jesus Christ’s life
began to be written, first by Mark’s Gospel.
In
the late 19th century and the first part of the 20th century, there was another
definition of a Gospel. However, this definition accounts for a discipline
called form criticism. Form criticism flourished from the 1900 to 1950 and they
focused on the period of oral traditions about Jesus Christ. The form critics
concluded that during the forty-year oral period the stories circulated about
Jesus Christ were embellished or exaggerated. They argue the four Gospels of
the New Testament were based upon these embellished or exaggerated stories of
Jesus Christ. According to form critics when Mark received the oral traditions
of Jesus Christ’s life for his Gospel, these oral traditions were not “fresh”
from the source. Form critics argue that Mark’s oral sources about Jesus Christ
were now embellished stories as used in the life of the church. Thus, form
critics state the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were just collections
of oral embellished stories the early church had come to believe about Jesus
Christ. However, form critics failed to take into consideration that the New
Testament itself considered these oral traditions about Jesus Christ sacred and
authoritative and not mere embellished gossip (see e.g., Luke 1:1-2; 1
Corinthians 7; 1 Corinthians 15:3). Even more, form critics’ methodology for
assessing and critiquing the Gospels were flawed. For example, form critics
Rudolph Bultmann and J. Jeremias both used form critical methodology to assess
the Gospels. Using this same methodology Bultmann was very skeptical of the
history of the Gospel while Jeremias using the same form critical methodology
was very optimistic of the historical Jesus and the Gospel message. Thus, Jeremias
and Bultmann essentially used the same form critical methodology and concluded with
two differing opinions about Jesus Christ. Thus, the methodology of form
criticism was not accurate and flawed and by the 1950’s, form criticism was
abandoned.
Today,
many modern biblical scholars define the Gospels as a theological portrait of Jesus.
When the Gospels were written, the Gospels were sent to first century Christian
communities that were mainly house churches. These Gospels were sent to these
house churches to help Christians dealing with their first century troubles and
circumstances. The Gospel writers were written by people that believed in Jesus
and therefore the Gospels were evangelists. These evangelists were convinced of
Jesus Christ and they were trying to convince others. Thus, Gospel writers gave
the house churches a portrait of Jesus Christ and a portrait is essentially an
interpretation of Jesus Christ by an artist. That is why the portraits of Jesus
Christ are different in each Gospel because each Gospel writers are writing to
their specific audience and addressing their audiences’ specific first century issues.
That is why Irenaeus and the other church resisted incorporating the Gospels
into one story of Jesus because each Gospel gives a different and distinct portrait
or witness about Jesus Christ. In the 20th century, a Gospel discipline
called redaction criticism tried to understand the Gospel text holistically and
connect the Gospel to a first century event or situation. However, many argued
this method is flawed like form criticism. So the most common method today is
“story approach” in understanding a Gospel. This approach reads the Gospel
holistically like redaction criticism but do not tie the Gospel to a first
century situation. However, some critics
of the story approach argue without considering the first century circumstances
surrounding the Gospels, the Gospels would be a short distance to an allegory. Most
biblical scholars today read the Gospels as a story while also considering the
cultural, religious, and historical conditions of the first century.
References
Zondervan NIV
Study Bible
(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008).
Butler,
Trent. Holman Bible Dictionary (Broadman
& Holman Pub., 1991).
Edwards,
James R. The Gospel According to Mark
(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002).
Kelber,
Werner. Mark’s Story of Jesus (Houston, TX: Fortress Press, 1979).
Loyd,
Melton, Ph.D., Professor of New Testament. Due West Campus: Erskine Theological
Seminary, 2015.
Wiersbe,
Warren W. Bible Exposition Commentary
(Victor Books, 1989).
Youngblood,
Ronald F. Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible
Dictionary (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Pub., 1995).