Jesus and His disciples left Galilee and went up
to the villages near Caesarea Philippi. As they were walking along, He asked
them, “Who do people say I am?” “Well,” they replied, “some say John the
Baptist, some say Elijah, and others say You are one of the other prophets.” Then
He asked them, “But who do you say I am?” Peter replied, “You are the Messiah
(Christ).” But Jesus warned them not to tell anyone about Him. Then Jesus began
to tell them that the Son of Man must suffer many terrible things and be
rejected by the elders, the leading priests, and the teachers of religious law.
He would be killed, but three days later He would rise from the dead.
Mark
8:27-31 (NLT)
In
Mark 8, Jesus and His disciples traveled to Caesarea Philippi (Mark 8:27). The
region of Caesar Philippi is the northern most area of the Holy Land. Then,
Jesus asked His disciples: “Who do people say I am?” (Mark 8:27). The disciples
gave Jesus common opinions of the day as to His identity (Mark 8:28). The
disciples told Jesus that some called Him: “John the Baptist, some say Elijah,
and others say You are one of the other prophets” (Mark 8:28, NLT). Up until
Mark 8, Jesus had been avoiding His true identity to the people. Then, Jesus
asked the disciples, “But who do you say that I am?” (Mark 8:29). Peter
answered Jesus as the self-appointed spokesman, “You are the Messiah (Christ)”
(Mark 8:29; see also Matthew 16:16; Luke 9:20).
Messiah is the Hebrew word for the Greek word “Christ.” The term “Christ”
means the “Anointed One.” The key term was “Christ.” The name “Jesus Christ”
means Jesus the Messiah. Jesus commanded His disciples to tell no one about His
true identity as the Messiah. Once again, Jesus invoked the Messianic secret to
shield His true identity during His public ministry (Mark 8:30).
Then
at Mark 8:31, Jesus began to teach His disciples about the Son of Man and the
coming suffering and rejection of the Son of Man (Matthew 16:21; Mark 8:31;
Luke 9:22). After Peter’s true confession of His identity, Jesus does not
identify Himself as the “Christ.” Instead, Jesus identified Himself as the “Son
of Man.” Jesus has many titles in the Holy Scriptures: Son of God (Mark 1:1;
Mark 15:39), Messiah (Christ) (Mark 8:29-30; John 20:31), God (Isaiah 40:3;
John 1:1-5, 14; Colossians 2:9), Lord (Romans 10:9), Prophet (Matthew 21:11),
Rabbi or Teacher (John 3:2); Second Adam or Last Adam (Romans 5:12-21; 1
Corinthians 15:21-22, 45-49) and King of the Jews (Matthew 27:37). Jesus is God
incarnate (in the flesh) and the fullness of God dwelt within Jesus (John
1:1-5, 14; Colossians 1:19; Colossians 2:9; Titus 2:13). Moreover, Jesus is not
just a Messenger from God but Jesus is God (John 1:1; John 20:28; Romans 9:5).
However, “Son of Man” was Jesus’ most common title for Himself during His
public ministry on earth (e.g., Mark 2:10; Luke 19:10). The first time that
Jesus is referred to Himself as the “Son of Man” occurred at Mark 2:10 with the
healing of a paralytic man (Mark 2:3-12).
The
title “Son of Man” is used fourteen times in Mark's Gospel, and only from the
mouth of Jesus. Twelve of these references are found after Mark 8:29 when
Apostle Peter confessed Jesus as the Christ of God (see Mark 2:10, 28; Mark
8:31, 38; Mark 9:9, 12, 31; Mark 10:33, 45; Mark 13:26, 34; Mark 14:21, 41, 61-62).
Overall, Jesus used this title Son of Man for Himself approximately eighty-one
(81) times in the New Testament Gospels. The title “Son of Man” is used three
different ways by Jesus. In three instances, Son of Man occurs in an
apocalyptic context, as used in Daniel 7 and 1 Enoch 37-69, where the Son of
Man comes in judgement. Also, the Son of Man refers to Jesus’ earthly authority
and power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10) and supersede the Sabbath (see Mark 2:28;
Luke 6:5). The most predominant usage of the Son of Man concerns Jesus’ pending
suffering as God’s final sacrifice for human sin (see Mark 8:31; Mark 9:9, 12,
31; Mark 10:33, 45; Mark 14:21, 41). Thus, Jesus’ title as the Son of Man is
not merely indirectness for “the human one.”
The
“Son of Man” was Jesus’ favorite designation of Himself during His public
ministry on earth. In the Gospels, no one else called Jesus the “Son of Man”
except Jesus Himself. Outside the four Gospels, Apostle Paul never called Jesus
the Son of Man and Jesus’ disciple never called Jesus “Son of Man.” However, Stephen
in the book of Acts called Jesus the “Son of Man.” As Stephen was
dying as a martyr in the book of Acts, Stephen sees a vision of the Son of Man
standing on the right hand of God (Acts 7:55-56). Obviously, Stephen was
referring to Jesus. In Acts 7:56, Stephen beheld the ascended Son of Man
standing beside the throne of God to receive him into heaven. Also in book of
Revelation, the Apostle John had visions of the Son of Man as Judge of the
world (see Revelation 1:13; Revelation 14:14-16).
Prophet
Daniel: “As my vision continued that night, I saw someone like a Son of Man
coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient One and was led
into His presence. He was given authority, honor, and sovereignty over all the
nations of the world, so that people of every race and nation and language
would obey Him. His rule is eternal — it will never end. His kingdom will never
be destroyed.” Daniel 7:13-14 (NLT)
From
the Old Testament, “Son of Man” is used in the apocalyptic sense as seen in
Daniel 7:13-14 where the Prophet Daniel envisioned a “the Son of Man” at the
end of days appearing before the throne of God. In the book of Daniel, the Son
of Man is like a representative of a purified of Israel or a representative of
Israel. In Daniel 7:13-14, the Prophet Daniel envisioned an exalted and
heavenly Messianic figure “like a Son of Man” (that is, having human form). His
exact identity is not specified, but His role is clear: The Most High God has
appointed Him to rule an eternal, universal kingdom that will be over all other
nations (Daniel 7:14). Also, this heavenly Figure represented His own people,
the holy people of the Most High. These holy people will also share in this Son
of Man’s Kingdom over all peoples and nations (Daniel 7:22).
The
Old Testament book of Ezekiel also used “son of man” in a similar sense (e.g.,
Ezekiel 2:1-8). In the book of Ezekiel, the term “son of man” is used
ninety-three (93) times emphasizing the Prophet Ezekiel’s humanity as he was
addressed by the transcendent God. Son of Man comes from the Aramaic word
“Barnasha.” “Barnasha” in Aramaic is a synonym for man as first seen in the
book of Ezekiel. Yet, Jesus is the ultimate Son of Man who combines within
Himself the human aspect of the title with the exalted heavenly aspect (see
Daniel 7:13-14; Revelation 1:13-20). By obeying where Adam failed, Jesus became
the first member of God’s new community of faith. All other children of Adam
find hope in Him.
According
to the Old Testament, this Messianic figure “like a Son of Man” comes in the
end times with the clouds of heaven and He is given great authority, glory and sovereign
power (Daniel 7:13-14). Jesus also understood Himself as that One who would
return to earth in the clouds of heaven (see Mark 8:38; Mark 13:26; Mark
14:61-62; Revelation 1:7). That He comes “with the clouds of heaven” indicates
His heavenly origin (Daniel 7:13; see also Exodus 13:21-22; Exodus 19:9; Acts
1:9; 1 Thessalonians 4:17).
One
reason Jesus preferred the title “Son of Mas” was because Son of Man was not an
inflammatory title such as “Christ” or “Messiah.” The dominate view of the
Christ in the first century was that the Christ would be a military and
political conqueror that will return the Jews to power and punish the Jews’ enemies
(Daniel 9:25-26). Because popular Jewish ideas associated with the term
“Christ” were largely political and national, Jesus seldom used Christ to refer
to Himself. In the Gospels, Jesus did not want to identify Himself with the
normal Jewish understanding of Christ. The title “Son of Man” was largely free
of the political and military meanings associated with the Christ. Yet, Jesus
was the long-awaited Messiah predicted by the Old Testament (Matthew 1:17).
Also
in the New Testament, Jesus appeared to have taken the Jewish apocalyptic
notion of the Son of Man as a Warrior Figure that will appear at the end of age
to destroy evil. Generally speaking, in Jewish apocalyptic literature there is
a Figure that is sometimes called “Son of Man” and sometimes the Son of Man
appears as a Warrior Ram. The Son of Man appears at the end of age to engage
the forces of evil in the final battle of history. Generally in Jewish
literature, the Son of Man generally preceded the Messiah and at other times the
Son of Man is usually identified with the Messiah. Either way, the Messiah then
sets up His Kingdom on earth. Thus, Jesus’ Jewish audience hearing Jesus
referring to Himself as the Son of Man would probably have associated Jesus’
reference to Himself as the Son of Man with a fiery apocalyptic Warrior or
military Figure that engage the forces of evil in the final battle of history.
“For even the Son of Man came not to be served but
to serve others and to give His life as a ransom for many.” Mark 10:45
(NLT)
The
true authority of the “Son of Man” is revealed in Jesus’ humiliation, suffering,
and death. The “Son of Man” includes severe suffering as its primary revelation
(e.g. see Mark 10:45). Jesus came into this world as a Suffering Servant and
Redeemer who would suffer and die for human redemption (salvation) as the
Prophet Isaiah clearly predicted at Isaiah 52:13-53:12 (see also Romans 3:25; 2
Corinthians 5:21). Jesus often used “Son of Man” to describe Himself as the
Suffering Redeemer envisioned by the Prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 52:13–53:12 see
also see e.g., Matthew 12:40; Matthew 16:21-28; Matthew 17:9, 12, 22; Matthew
20:18, 28; Matthew 26:2, 24, 45; Luke 9:21-27; Mark 8:29-31; Mark 9:9, 12, 31;
Mark 10:33-34, 45; Mark 14:21, 41). Jesus often combined the common Jewish
understanding of the Son of Man with another Jewish tradition found at Isaiah
52:13–53:12 concerning the “Suffering Servant.” At Isaiah 52:13–53:12, the
Prophet Isaiah envisioned a Suffering Servant that does not fight back against
His enemies and He is slayed like a Lamb (see also John 1:29, 35-36; Hebrews
4:15; 1 John 3:5). Thus, Jesus combined the notions of Son of Man and Suffering
Servant and identified His true identity of coming to destroy the power of evil
(see also Mark 3:23-27). As the Son of Man, Jesus came to deliver people from
the power of sin and evil (1 Peter 2:22, 24). Jesus does not destroy evil with
another evil. Instead, Jesus willingly absorbed the power and forces of evil
into His pure body through His sacrificial death on the Cross that we may die
to sin and live for righteousness (see also Mark 8:31; Mark 9:31; Mark 10:33-34;
Romans 5:6; Romans 6:3-14). When Jesus was ridiculed and dead for humanities’
sin, Jesus did not perform the law of revenge (see Romans 12:17-21). As the Son
of Man, Jesus destroyed the powers of evil not by meeting evil with another
evil. Instead, Jesus soak up evil in Himself and this is the only way evil dies
as one does not return evil. This is what is meant that Jesus died for our sins
and died in our place (2 Corinthians 5:21). The only way to destroy evil is not
returning evil! Jesus disarmed and destroyed evil by not returning evil and
this is grand paradox of the Son of Man. Jesus also calls His followers to
humility, obedience, and suffering to obtain victory over sin and evil (see
Matthew 5:39-42, 44-45; 1 Thessalonians 5:15; 1 Peter 3:9). Following Jesus
requires self-denial, complete dedication to God, and willing obedience to Him
(Luke 9:23; John 14:15-21).
References
Life
Application Study Bible (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Pub., 2005).
NLT Study
Bible
(Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Pub., 2008).
Zondervan NIV
Study Bible
(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008).
Edwards,
James R. The Gospel According to Mark
(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002).
Loyd,
Melton, Ph.D., Professor of New Testament. Due West Campus: Erskine Theological
Seminary, 2015.
Wiersbe,
Warren W. Bible Exposition Commentary
(Victor Books, 1989).